MAP

Monday, 23 October 2017

A NEW VIEW ON GRAVITY AND THE DARK SIDE OF THE COSMOS: Erik Verlinde Public Lecture

ARE OUR EMAILS, ORAL PRESENTATION IN INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE
OR BLOGS NOT A LEGAL?

IF ALIENS ARE PRESENT & THEY APPROACHES US THEN WHAT WE SAYS 
FIRST SPEAK/WRITE IN OUR SCIENTIFIC LANGUAGE?

IS OUR SCIENCE SO NARROW?

IS THEIR PRESENCE NOT ENOUGH TO PROVE  THEIR SUPERIORITY IN TECHNOLOGY & THOUGHT PROCESS. SHOULD NOT WE TRY TO LEARN FROM IT?

‘OUT OF BOX THINKING IS ESSENTIAL IN SCIENCE’


I am the individual researcher, working on ‘Theory of Everything on the basis of Dark Atom & Dark Energy’.

I had given oral presentation in the International Science Conference, Vietnam on “Planetary System – a synergistic view” [19th – 25th, July’ 2015]. My topic was “Regeneration of Star & formation of a Solar system – a Potter man's concept”.

Later NASA also hinted the role of SOPERNOVA in planet formation.

had also applied [after receiving the mail of James Forrest sir on 11th, Nov.’2016 & confirmation by Academic Program Manager on 07th, Dec.’2017] for ‘Perimeter Scholars International, 2017-18 but unfortunately not selected.

Kindly refer to “A new view on gravity and the dark side of the cosmos: Erik Verlinde Public Lecture on 07th, Oct.’2017 in Perimeter Institute of Theoretical Physics, Canada”


In this lecture he explained Gravity as a side-effect, not a cause, of what happens in the universe’.

Sir, I had also written in 2013 that 'Gravity' is an 'Effect', which is PULLING by nature, but its CAUSE is certainly not a PULLING FORCE as it has been assumed, claimed & proved time and again’.


Reference:

A paper "GRAVITY"- a PUSHING FORCE [-a "Layman concept of Unified Dark Energy"]" sent by me on 17th, Aug.'2013 to one of the reputed Journal 'General Relativity and Gravitation’, It was rejected due to scientific language.

MANUSCRIPT No.   GERG-D-13-00356      [I have mail & pdf - file generated by the Journal]


In this manuscript I had not only explained the factors on which gravity depends but also explained the different phenomenon like tide, variation of gravity at different height, expansion of universe, reason of extra force on other side of the moon etc.

I already raised following questions in my blog “An Open Letter” ON 25th, March’’2016

What if I get a paper & I reject it on the ground of scientific language and after few years someone is saying the same but in so called scientific language?

Is it JUSTIFIED to give no credit to the original writer?

I opine that in science facts are more important than language because science is trying to search facts from CITIZEN SCIENTISTS, from MAYA PROPHECIES & from ANCIENT MONUMENTS?

Thanks to PERIMETER INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS for searching science.”


I had also written the same in e-mail to different genius of our scientific world including John Moffat sir on 29th, Mar.’2016, Ashtekar sir on 28th, Mar.’2016, Lukash Vladimir Nikolaevich sir on 28th, Mar.’2016, Sandip P Trivedi sir 28th, Mar.’2016 and others.


My other comments on Gravity are:

(i)  'PLANCK' PUTS EINSTEIN TO THE TEST’  [Indicate role of Dark energy in         GRAVITATION]

        [PL. REF. MY COMMENTS IN IT]

(ii) ‘WHAT IS DARK ENERGY?’ February 1, 2016 by Thomas Kitching, Ucl, The               Conversation                                    [Indicate Pushing nature of GRAVITATION]
        
        [PL. REF. MY COMMENTS IN IT]

Since 2013, I have been not only saying but also explained that it is ‘PUSHING FORCE’ & ‘ARISING DUE TO DARK ENERGY’.


I SEEK YOUR HELP & EXPERT ADVICE ON

a.  How I proceed further? I don't know how to write scientific paper but have hard copy of my work on many   topics    [ref. my all comments in my blog - www.swarajgroups.blogspot.in]?

b.  How I give reference of what I had written in my oral presentation because organising committee had not   published the proceeding that year. [But I have original PPT presentation; any agency can check its   originality. There is no change since July ’2015]

After confirmation from organising committee that they were not going to publish proceeding, I   had taken DOI from FIGSHARE, but, it is also not working.


c.  How I refer my unpublished paper? It is very important for coming science? [I have original PDF; any agency can check its originality. There is no change]

d. How I present my all raw data/work immediately before SCIENCE COMMUNITY for further discussion?   Since 2013 I am seeking platform.

It is least expected by the individual researcher from the established scientist of the world.

I don’t want a certificate of correctness at this stage of science, I only want to put my handwritten work in record.

If it is in record I can take professional help to convert it in scientific language or in book.

All the comments, views or 2nd opinion in my blog, in different science magazines/periodicals/blogs are the part of Universal science [based on 100% stuffs - including dark atom & white atom]

Let us think, instead of expending millions & trillions each year, thousands may change the concept of science. I am confident about my hypothesis.

Some people may say it is speculation, but I want to ask ‘IS ANY NEW SPECULATIVE HYPOTHESIS CAN EXPLAINS/RE-EXPLAINS/ PREDICTS SO MANY PHENOMENONS mentioned in my blog / conference / magazine / periodical / other’s blogs?


SOME IMPORTANT LINKS ARE:

"THE FABRIC OF SPACE AND TIME IS IN TURMOIL" --More on Stephen Hawking's Black Hole Update, - 14th, Feb.'2014



UNIVERSAL SCIENCE – on the basis of White Atom, Dark Atom & Dark Energy



“THEORY of EVERYTHING”- 1st step on the basis of Dark Energy & Dark M“THEORY of EVERYTHING” – 1st  Step on the basis of Dark Energy & Dark Matter



WHY "THEORY OF EVERYTHING - ON THE BASIS OF DARK ATOM & DARK ENERGY" IS IMPORTANT 



LIGO'S TWIN BLACK HOLES MIGHT HAVE BEEN BORN INSIDE A SINGLE STAR



WHAT IF EINSTEIN SEEMS RIGHT WITHOUT HIS THEORIES & PREDICTIONS?



GIANT EXOPLANET HUNTERS: LOOK FOR DEBRIS DISKS, October 11, 2017




Are we standing on the brink of a new scientific revolution that will radically change our views on space, time, and gravity?
In most circumstances, the theories of Einstein and Newton adequately describe gravity, but on cosmological scales, big questions arise, particularly surrounding the nature of dark matter and dark energy.
These questions are ushering in a revolution in theoretical physics – a completely new view on spacetime and gravity. Research in string theory and black hole physics, involving key concepts of quantum information theory, reveals a deep connection between the structure of space-time and the origin of gravity.
This research suggests that gravity is not a fundamental force of nature, but rather an emergentphenomenon, similar to how temperature is an emergent phenomenon that arises from the movement of particles. That is, gravity is a side-effect, not a cause, of what happens in the universe.
In his October 4 public lecture at Perimeter Institute, Erik Verlinde (University of Amsterdam) explored the core ideas behind this research, and examined the implications of this fast-emerging revolution in our understanding of the universe.

Saturday, 21 October 2017

GIANT EXOPLANET HUNTERS: LOOK FOR DEBRIS DISKS, October 11, 2017

IS PRESENTATION IN AN INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE USELESS?

A new study finds that giant exo-planets that orbit far from their stars are more likely to be found around young stars that have a disk of dust and debris than those without disks.

2nd  OPINION:

I am not convinced by the use of word ‘young stars’ and ‘giant exoplanet’ actually they are ‘secondary stars’ [young stars are made at another location of the galaxy] & ‘junior sun’ [failed stars – look their composition] respectively as I explained in my oral presentation in International Science Conference in Vietnam on “Planetary System – a synergistic view” [19th – 25th, July’ 2015]. My topic was “Regeneration of Star & formation of a Solar system – a Potter man's concept”

Reference-1


This study is the largest to date of stars with dusty debris disks, and has found the best evidence yet that giant planets are responsible for keeping that material in check.”

“Our own solar system is home to gas giants responsible for making "debris belts" -- the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, shaped by Jupiter”

2nd  OPINION:

I explained in my oral presentation in International Science Conference in Vietnam on “Planetary System – a synergistic view” [19th – 25th, July’ 2015]. My topic was “Regeneration of Star & formation of a Solar system – a Potter man's concept”

Reference-1


SOME OTHER LINK



There's no map showing all the billions of exoplanets hiding in our galaxy -- they're so distant and faint compared to their stars, it's hard to find them. Now, astronomers hunting for new worlds have established a possible signpost for giant exoplanets.
A new study finds that giant exoplanets that orbit far from their stars are more likely to be found around young stars that have a disk of dust and debris than those without disks. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, focused on planets more than five times the mass of Jupiter. This study is the largest to date of stars with dusty debris disks, and has found the best evidence yet that giant planets are responsible for keeping that material in check.
"Our research is important for how future missions will plan which stars to observe," said Tiffany Meshkat, lead author and assistant research scientist at IPAC/Caltech in Pasadena, California. Meshkat worked on this study as a postdoctoral researcher at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. "Many planets that have been found through direct imaging have been in systems that had debris disks, and now we know the dust could be indicators of undiscovered worlds."
Astronomers found the likelihood of finding long-period giant planets is nine times greater for stars with debris disks than stars without disks. Caltech graduate student Marta Bryan performed the statistical analysis that determined this result.
Researchers combined data from 130 single-star systems with debris disks detected by NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope, and compared them with 277 stars that do not appear to host disks. The two star groups were between a few million and 1 billion years old. Of the 130 stars, 100 were previously scanned for exoplanets. As part of this study, researchers followed up on the other 30 using the W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii and the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile. They did not detect any new planets in those 30 systems, but the additional data helped characterize the abundance of planets in systems with disks.
The research does not directly resolve why the giant exoplanets would cause debris disks to form. Study authors suggest the massive gravity of giant planets causes small bodies called planetesimals to collide violently, rather than form proper planets, and remain in orbit as part of a disk.
"It's possible we don't find small planets in these systems because, early on, these massive bodies destroyed the building blocks of rocky planets, sending them smashing into each other at high speeds instead of gently combining," said co-author Dimitri Mawet, a Caltech associate professor of astronomy and a JPL senior research scientist.
On the other hand, giant exoplanets are easier to detect than rocky planets, and it is possible that there are some in these systems that have not yet been found.
Our own solar system is home to gas giants responsible for making "debris belts" -- the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, shaped by Jupiter, and the Kuiper Belt, shaped by Neptune. Many of the systems Meshkat and Mawet studied also have two belts, but they are also much younger than ours -- up to 1 billion years old, compared to our system's present age of 4.5 billion years. The youth of these systems partly explains why they contain much more dust -- resulting from the collisions of small bodies -- than ours does.
One system discussed in the study is Beta Pictoris, which has been directly imaged from ground-based telescopes. This system has a debris disk, comets and one confirmed exoplanet. In fact, scientists predicted this planet's existence well before it was confirmed, based on the presence and structure of the prominent disk.
In a different scenario, the presence of two dust belts in a single debris disk suggests there are likely more planets in the system whose gravity maintains these belts, as is the case in the HR8799 system of four giant planets. The gravitational forces of giant planets nudge passing comets inward toward the star, which could mimic the period of our solar system's history about 4 billion years ago known as the Late Heavy Bombardment. Scientists think that during that period, the migration of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune deflected dust and small bodies into the Kuiper and asteroid belts we see today. When the Sun was young, there would have been a lot more dust in our solar system as well.
"By showing astronomers where future missions such as NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have their best chance to find giant exoplanets, this research paves the way to future discoveries," said Karl Stapelfeldt of JPL, chief scientist of NASA's Exoplanet Exploration Program Office and study co-author.
For more information about exoplanets, visit:

News Media Contact
Elizabeth Landau
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA
818-354-6425
elizabeth.landau@jpl.nasa.gov

2017-265