MAP

Tuesday, 8 March 2016

UNIVERSAL SCIENCE – on the basis of White Atom, Dark Atom & Dark Energy

It is coined & promoted by me since 2013.

On 24th, July’ 2015, in Vietnam I had explained some UNIVERSAL FACTS of our UNIVERSE. 

Reference:

1.  “OUT OF BOX THINKING’ IS ESSENTIAL IN BASIC SCIENCE” written on 20th, June’ 2013


2.  “THEORY of EVERYTHING”- 1st step on the basis of Dark Energy & Dark Matter” written on 24th, Jan.’ 2015


3.  "GRAVITY"- a PUSHING FORCE [-a "Layman concept of Unified Dark Energy"]” sent on 17th, Aug.’2013 to world’s on of the reputed Journal ‘General Relativity and Gravitation. Unfortunately it was rejected due to lack of Scientific language but now it VERY IMPORTANT for new science i.e. UNIVERSAL SCIENCE [Explained by me in my oral presentation  in Vietnam also]

  MANUSCRIPT NO. - GERG-D-13-00356


4.  It is the part of my oral presentation on “Regeneration of Star & formation of a Solar system – a Potter man's concept” in International Science conference [“Planetary System – a synergistic view”] at Vietnam [19th-25th , July’15]


Universal Science is based on the 100% stuffs. My all the comments on the different topics is based on UNIVERSAL SCIENCE.


Our present Science is based on 4-6% stuffs only. It is actually a TERRESTRIAL SCIENCE, better to say APPLIED SCIENCE.

All the TERMS  of  terrestrial science are not UNIVERSAL. We are saying Universal Gravitational Constant, is it really so? We are saying universe is made up of Space-time, is it rally so? Time is universal, is Cs vibrate at all place of the universe at a same frequency? Mass is constant, is it really so? Gravity is pulling, is it really so? Time contract & dilate, is it really so?

Our universe is one, so the exact theory behind its formation is also one. Think what if, Einstein is not born at some other parts of the universe? How they know about SPACE-TIME, How they know about reason of gravity? How they know about relativity? How they prove speed of light? 

  Reference:

  WHAT IF EINSTEIN SEEMS RIGHT WITHOUT HIS THEORIES & PREDICTIONS?


Is alien, [if exist] also know our MATHEMATICS ?

In my view our present science is application based. 

There is no doubt that Mathematics is ESSENTIAL for APPLICATION & EXPERIMENTATION, but it is not always good for the EXPLANATION of  different phenomenon.

UNIVERSE IS NOT MADE BY MATHEMATICAL FORMULA i.e.. AFTER THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR MATHEMATICS.

‘If  I go 2 km east & then 2² km north, I get a mathematics book’. Now, I can say to follow my formula to get the mathematics book. Everybody who use my formula, get the books, it means I am right, not only once but time & again..  But, is it the only & the best approach/path to get the book? 

Science, work on conditions of a place. If particular condition exists anywhere in the universe, that a particular phenomenon will occurs. So we have to first find the conditions under which the particular thing is happening.

   Reference:

  MAIN CONDITION IS EXPLAINED  ON 24TH, JULY’ 2015 BY ME IN VIETNAM.


The main reason of diabetes is not the low secretion of insulin, it is also not a defects in pancreas, it is also not a defects in/expression of particular gene. In my view the real reason is the condition due to which sequence of constituents of gene are changing.

Similarly, carbon dioxide comes out of the body & oxygen go in due to the diffusion i.e. due to the concentration difference, BUT WHAT CAUSE CONCENTRATION DIFFERENCE?

My “THEORY OF EVERYTHING – on the basis if Dark Atom & Dark Energy” is the UNIVERSAL SCIENCE.

I am not claiming that “I AM THE ONLY GAME IN THE TOWN”. But I am sure that “MY RULE [UNIVERSAL SCIENCE] WILL CHANGE THE GAME”.

My work is important because I'm thinking out of box, I am looking the Universe from another window (of Dark Matter & Dark Energy) while our scientific window is different but on many topic we are drawing the same picture of  universe. [www.swarajgroups.blogspot.in]

The sequence in Science are:

  1. OBSERVATION,
  2. HYPOTHESIS/SPECULATION
  3. EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENT PHENOMENON BY THE HYPOTHESIS
  4. PREDICTION
  5. MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION
  6. EXPERIMENTATION
  7. APPLICATION

Our terrestrial Science also develop in above sequence but now we are mainly focused on point 5, 6 & 7

In case of Universal Science I  am struggling to reach up to point 4 only. 

I NEED HELP TO PROMOTE IT TO  LEVEL 5, 6 & 7.

I AM OPEN TO WORK WITH GOOD TEAM TO AMEND [IF REQUIRED] & PROMOTE THE UNIVERSAL SCIENCE.

CERN also indicating a different Science.

1 comment:

  1. Are the Constants of Physics Constant?
    So far, they seem to be—but nobody really understands why

    By Venkat Srinivasan on March 7, 2016

    http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/are-the-constants-of-physics-constant/?WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20160307

    ReplyDelete